© Heather AVV, aka "Babs".
May, 2004

Don't/Do Drugs

"NONE of the drugs used in obstetric care has been proven safe for the fetus exposed to the drug in utero. None of the pharmaceutical manufacturers of those drugs approved by the FDA for use in obstetrics has carried out periodic neurological examinations of children exposed to their drug products in utero. The FDA has not required companies to provide such data . . ." [read more]

No medication is 100% safe. Not Tylenol, not Paxil, and not an epidural. Everything has a potential side effect, risk, drug interaction - and it doesn't just depend on your body chemistry, some chemicals are just plain not healthy.

Just because it's 'approved' by the FDA, people like it, it's available on the shelf, or it's used very often does not automatically mean it is safe. Pain medication for labour is the most common intervention used, offered, and sometimes even forced on a pregnant woman. They come in many varieties:

Caudal anesthesia, Pudendal block, epidural block, Demerol/Pethidine (a derivative of morphine), Spinal Block, Gas & Air (Entonox), Sparine and chloral - to name a few.

You may be told there are minimal, almost nonexistent risks, and the benefits outweigh any that could possibly come up. Drugs are pushed on mothers so heavily that many women choose to invite friends, or hire birth assistants specifically for the purpose of heeding off any 'friendly' nurses wielding needles. During the transition phase of labour, many women experience contractions that make them feel 'out of control', during which time many women will think about (ask for, scream for, threaten murder over) drugs. This is normal, and it passes. Unfortunately, nurses may be standing by waiting for these moments, and take advantage of them by offering drugs to prevent 'martyr birth', or remind you that drugs are safe, effective and everyone does them.

These are some of the risks, and facts about medication that you may not be told.

 

Epidural:
An epidural anesthesia is the most common type of pain relief chosen by labouring women. A local anesthetic is administered to the lower back, and then a very long needle is inserted into the spine which makes a hole that a catheter is threaded into. The needle is removed, and the catheter taped to your skin. Doses of pain relief are then filtered through the catheter. This process takes about twenty minutes to complete, during which the mother must remain still. The drug takes another 10-20 minutes to kick in. This link informatively outlines the risks associated with an epidural, and provides information on how to avoid them. These risks include: increased rate of cesarean section, loss of sexual function, prolonged labour, fever, and even a risk of abnormal heart rate and poor muscle tone in the new baby. Epidural can also inhibit a baby's suckling instinct, and decrease the sucking reflex, which can significantly impact the breastfeeding relationship. As many women can attest, just one bottle can make it or break it for some babies.
'Epidural Misadventures'
is "A review of the risk and complications associated with epidural anesthesia", and was written by a doctor in Halifax. The article is a lot more informative and dry than the title suggestions.
Medical Risks of an Epidural Anesthesia During Childbirth
is still under construction, but only because there is so much information to gather. Despite the warning of being 'unfinished', the information available and the research referenced is complete enough for a lot of reading. And finally, " Epidural: Real risks for mother and Baby".

 

Demerol/Pethidine:
Otherwise known as 'meperidine hydrochloride', or pethidine, the drug is similar to morphine and heroin. Pethidine is an opiate, and a depressant, it is claimed to work by mimicking endorphins. It is interesting to note that this drug is unrated, and not advised for use during pregnancy. Pethidine is administered via an intra-muscular shot usually into the thigh or buttock but occasionally is given via an IV drip, and has been used since the 1940's. The drug takes between 10 and 20 minutes to begin working when administered by a shot, and only a few moments when given through an IV. It lasts between two and three hours by shot, but wears off much quicker through the IV. Studies have shown it to be highly ineffective, in fact 48% of women said it gave them no pain relief at all, and 60% of women who took it asked for an epidural later. Even though the drug has been shown not to inhibit pain, the doses are high enough to have an effect on the baby, including significantly impaired motor ability. Half of the infants exposed to it failed to breastfeed - this effect can last days. Pethidine crosses the placenta and comes into the milk, because it is a depressant it has an effect on the baby's respiratory center, the effects are the worst if the baby is born within two to three hours after the injection. An antidote can be given to the baby to reverse the effects, however the antidote wears off quickly and the breathing and motor problems can come back, also long term effects of the antidote have not been studied. Babies whose mothers had pethidine are also more likely to develop jaundice, or require neonatal care and be separated from the mother for long periods of time. As with any narcotic pain relief, children exposed to it are more likely to become drug-addicted in adulthood, one study cites that they instance is 4.7 times higher. Babies exposed to pethidine also showed a greater difficulty in quieting once they became upset, this was still noted three, and six weeks postpartum.
For more information on pethidine, visit "Pethidine - a Little shot of something not so nice", "Drugs in Labour: What effects do they have twenty years hence?". Unfortunately there's not a whole lot of information outlining the risks and/or benefits of pethidine or demerol so my links for this one are lacking.

 

Entonox:
Entonox, otherwise known as "gas and air" or nitrous oxide (laughing gas) is the most common pain medication used by midwives for their patients, one of two pain medications that can be taken into a home birth setting, and is much less often used in hospital birth. It is self-administered by way of breathing through a mask or mouthpiece attached to a portable canister, or constant source (like those with oxygen in many hospitals). The gas has a sweetish taste, and needs a few fast, deep inhalations to speed up the initial pain relief. A distinct flowing sound can be heard when breathing correctly. Relief can be felt as quickly as twenty seconds, and as long as two minutes, but it only takes fifteen seconds for the nitrous oxide to reach your brain from your lungs.
Contraindications for entonox during labour are few and far between, it is one of the least dangerous pain 'medications' used, however it is also one of the least effective (next to demerol), one half of women who were given entonox reported significant pain relief. It is out of the bloodstream in a matter of moments, and is similarly out of the baby once they begin to cry. It does not have an impact on the baby's respiration, ability to suckle or motor functions, however studies have linked entonox use during labour to an increased risk of using amphetamines later in life. Entonox gives a 'high' or 'drunk' feeling, and relief is best felt during early labour. It can effect a woman's ability to push during second stage of labour, and be very dehydrating so water intake should be monitored. Side effects in the mother include dizziness, nausea, vomiting, and poor recollection of labour.
More information on Entonox can be found at, "Royal North Shore Pain Site" or the Pregnancy.com information section on nitrous oxide. Like Demerol, the information on entonox is lacking but this is mostly due to the fact that it is so rarely used in North America.

 

There are many alternatives to a medicated birth, including natural forms of pain-control that your caregiver may not discuss with you.
Water birth is also called an 'aquadural' for it's amazing pain-relief qualities; floating in a tub of water takes the pressure off your hips and back, it can take the 'back' out of back labour, allow you to change positions easily and comfortably, help you focus and remain calm. Studies have shown that in first time mothers, labouring in the water reduces the want for pain medication by half. Waterbirthing also significantly reduces the risk of tearing, or a need for an episiotomy.
More information on Water Birthing can be found at "WaterBirth International" and "The Water Birth Website" and "Water Birth (a large collection of links, books, pamphlets and other information)" and "Waterbirth Babies May be Healthier"

Hypnobirthing is an option that is rarely heard about. A common misconception is that in order to practice hypnobirthing you must be hypnotized by someone, the way we envision an audience member coming up on stage to the Great Gambino with a swirly coin. Hypnobirthing is defined as 'focused concentration', you've probably hypnotized yourself this way on many occasions and not recognized it. It is a natural response to pain, and for some it comes very easily. Some people are not susceptible to hypnosis, but it's not as many as you'd think: around 95% of the population can be successfully hypnotized, but a lot has to do with your willingness and belief. Classes and private instructors are available in many locations. Hypnobirth can be one of the most effective forms of pain relief you can try, it boasts a high success rate in reducing pain to "manageable", "pressure", "None until transition" and even "none at all". Yes, women have actually given birth without a bit of pain as a result of successful hypnobirthing. For more information on hypnobirthing, check out "HypnoBabies",

TENS (Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation) machines are available for use at most alternative medicine, physiotherapy or chiropractic clinics. If you've ever had back pain, you may have had one used on you. Four small pads are placed at key points on your body, and when the machine is turned on you'll feel a pulsing sensation as it stimulates your nerves to produce more endorphins; the natural pain relief within your body.
You can find out more information on TENS at "MidwifeInfo", "Spine Inc." and even rent a machine from the "BabyCare TENS" website!

If you are curious, like to be informed or feel passionately (and even if you don't) I highly recommend reading articles about childbirth interventions and collections of information like the ones found Here (Evaluated Childbirth: Interventions), or here (Childbirth interventions). For a more intimate look at the effects (both physical and psychological) of interventions of all kinds, you may want to read an article called "The Rape of the 20th Century", I will give a warning of it's intensity though.

 

 

 

Part II: Doulas, Homebirth and other birth options.

Doulas:
One of the first things you can do to immediately reduce your risk of drugs or other interventions is to get a doula. Doulas are not like midwives or doctors; they don't deliver babies, or have a part in prenatal management. A doula is a birth and postpartum specialist, a friend, a breastfeeding counselor, a support center. They provide emotional, physical, and informational support, and complement a doctor or midwife (or neither, should you choose!). A doula will be with you during your labour and help to preserve your birth experience, and help you during your recovery. Many doulas may even cook and bring meals for you during those first few weeks.

Studies conducted by Drs. Kluas and Kennell, founders of DONA (Doula of North America) have shown that women who use the services of a doula have 25% shorter labors, a higher VBAC success rate, and indicate a reduction in the:

  • chance of cesarean birth by 50%
  • use of pitocin by 40%
  • need for epidural anesthesia by 60%
  • need for narcotics by 30%
  • need for forceps or vacuum extraction by 40%
The Klaus/Kennel studies also indicate that women who have had the support of a doula have more positive feelings regarding their birth experience and an easier transition to motherhood.

Websites like the Doulas of North America can help you find a doula in your area. Or, go to Birth Partners to find anyone Birth or Pregnancy Related!

 

Home Birth: is a safer option in the majority of pregnancies. Unless you are high-risk, or having a baby before 37 weeks it is an option you can consider. Having a baby at home reduces fetal and maternal stress, complications, interventions and can help a mother feel safe and relaxed. The issue that many people have with homebirth is the safety factor, which gets a lot of negative attention in mainstream articles, but in reality it is the opposite . . .

From a World Health Organization (WHO) report - subsection on Place of Birth:
"It has never been scientifically proven that the hospital is a safer place than home for a woman who has had an uncomplicated pregnancy to have her baby. Studies of planned home births in developed countries with women who have had uncomplicated pregnancies have shown sickness and death rates for mother and baby equal to or better than hospital birth statistics for women with uncomplicated pregnancies."

On a webpage for a Texas-based Midwife, there are a series of quotations about the safety of homebirth. My choice quote from this page is this one:

"The results of this study showed a three times greater likelihood of cesarean operation if a woman gave birth in a hospital instead of at home with the hospital standing by. The hospital population revealed twenty times more use of forceps, twice as much use of oxytocin to accelerate or induce labor, greater incidence of episiotomy (while at the same time having more severe tears in need of major repair). The hospital group showed six times more infant distress in labor, five times more cases of maternal high blood pressure, and three times greater incidence of postpartum hemorrhage. There was four times more infection among the newborn; three times more babies that needed help to begin breathing. While the hospital group had thirty cases of birth injuries, including skull fractures, facial nerve palsies, brachial nerve injuries and severe cephalohematomas, there were no such injuries at home.
The infant death rate of the study was low in both cases and essentially the same. There were no maternal deaths for either home or hospital. The main differences were in the significant improvement of the mother's and baby's health if the couple planned a homebirth, and this was true despite the fact that the homebirth statistics of the study included those who began labor at home but ultimately needed to be transferred to the hospital"

[Dr. Lewis Mehl, "Home Birth Versus Hospital Birth: Comparisons of Outcomes of Matched Populations." Presented on October 20, 1976 before the 104th annual meeting of the American Public Health Association. For further information contact the Institute for Childbirth and Family Research, 2522 Dana St., Suite 201, Berkeley, CA 94704]


A study in the UK is introduced with these two paragraphs, "This is probably the most comprehensive study of home birth ever undertaken in the UK. It attempted to follow all women who booked a home birth in the UK in 1994. Midwives recorded outcomes for 5971 women who were booked for home births at 37 weeks' gestation, and they tried to find a matching woman from their practice who was as similar as possible to the home birth mother, but was booked to deliver in hospital. In some cases an appropriate matching hospital booking could not be found, so the hospital group only contained 4724 women.

The women were matched for age (within 5 yrs), number of previous children, where they lived, and past obstetric history. Thus, low-risk mothers were compared with other low-risk mothers, and the overall sample in the home birth group could be accurately compared to that in the matching group. The overall group profile was low-risk. For all outcomes, planned home births were compared with planned hospital births, so the data for planned home births include those births which occurred at home, and transfers to hospital. Separate data for transfers is also provided."

This study found the cesarean rate decreased by half and decreased the risk of assisted birth (IE. vacuum and forceps) by more than half. The home group had higher APGARs, less babies required oxygen at birth, and had better breastfeeding success.

This is a large collection of links regarding Homebirth safety, benefits, and general information. One of the best I have come across!

Many mothers who may wish to have a home birth are under the impression they would not be able to because of perceived complications. While some of these are valid, and a home birth should not be done with extreme complications, or risk factors, many are exaggerated in order to convince someone to have a medicalized birth. One of these is having a breech baby. It is well-known that a frank breech position is best delivered vaginally (bum first), but yet this and footling breech are automatically delivered by cesarean. Until just the last 30 or so years, all breech babies were delivered vaginally. The main reason that breech cases are not handled vaginally anymore is liability. However, you can still have a vaginal breech delivery should you feel it is best for you.

Breech baby delivered in hospital, vaginally. (Graphic photos)
Breech baby delivered at home (no photos)
For more information on breech birth, at home, center or hospital, try the "Heads up! All about Breech Babies" website.

Another common reason is if you are birthing more than one baby. But this is not the case, in fact it's not uncommon for mothers of multiples who wished a home birth to continue with one (I know someone personally who home-birthed her full-term, 8lb twins, unassisted). A quote from AIMS website reads, 'Women who are expecting twins are often persuaded to submit to obstetric management and undergo a caesarean section in the belief that this is safer for them and their babies. Since there have been no randomised trials there is no evidence that caesarean operations are safer for the babies than vaginal births and it is always likely to be less safe for the mother'

These issues and many others (including small pelvis, first child, or big baby) are addressed in a good article from the UK Homebirth site; "You can't have a homebirth because . . ."

 

Unassisted birth: is an option many women choose. Unassisted birth is at home, without any caregiver standing by. Unassisted births are done by families who have researched their options, know how to handle an emergency, and have the supplies they need or want on hand. It's often described as a liberating, wonderful experience and those that have chosen this route rarely have regrets over it. More information and support for Unassisted Birth can be found at the "Born Free!" childbirth site.

 

Links:

"Birth Love" is one of the best websites regarding natural and normal childbirth. While most of the site requires a paid membership, they have a large section of complimentary articles including one regarding the risks of ultrasound.

Childbirth.org has a wealth of information, organized by category.

"Midwifery Today" is based on the magazine for midwives, and contains up-to-date information, articles and forums open to caregivers and patients alike.

These are the Midwifery Research Archives, it contains years worth of saved NewsGroup threads. There is a search option, which you can take full advantage of to find research, studies, statistics, and informative discussions regarding a range of topics. I have not yet had the time to go through the archives, so I cannot give a detailed review at this point. However, sites that have linked to them sing the praises.

If anyone has a favorite natural, or gentle birth website please feel free to add it via a note.

On a Personal Note:
When I was pregnant, I found this website and looked through all of the birth stories. Shows like "Maternity Ward" never show a normal birth, every one has a perceived complication (and often real ones), a high-risk mother, or some other drama. Even tamer shows like "A Baby Story" were irritating, it was the same birth over and over, and I rarely got to see someone birthing in a natural setting. Many women are frightened when they see images of birth, personally I found it liberating. It was inspiring to see photographs of women's bodies doing what they were made to do, without medicine, without steel, without fear. It gave me confidence, and a knowledge that I could do this too. I didn't have to be afraid. All these women can do it, so can I. I would recommend that every pregnant woman view some normal, natural births and read some inspiring stories - know what your body can do, know that in the majority of situations you can do it naturally. Know that you have choices, alternatives, and you are not another procedure. Whether hospital, home, center or the backseat of your car on the way to one of said locations, you were made to give life.

[Home]

©2004, Heather AVV, aka "Babs". Please do not redistribute without my permission.
Email me : '
summerstorms at telus dot net' with questions, comments, or corrections.